Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Verify plantuml image generation in CI #9363

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

typeid
Copy link
Contributor

@typeid typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds generation of the plantuml images to CI through a new job, which runs on PRs. The job fails in case the generated images differ from the contained images in PRs.

This solution is not ideal:

  1. I'm reinstalling git in CI, as I couldn't find an image containing plantuml and git, and am not sure if we should be building it ourselves.
  2. The job refers to variables that are set in the Makefile, if e.g. the PLANTUML_VER changes, we might forget about this job.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #9331

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @typeid. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@typeid
Copy link
Contributor Author

typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

I see the job doesn't run in the PR CI yet, is there a way to test it? I have only tried it locally by using act.

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WDYT about having this be a make target - verify-diagrams which could then run in the verify job we already gave in a GitHub action. This means you would already have the code pulled and could use the same tools that are available.

The verify-gen make target is a good comparison.

@typeid
Copy link
Contributor Author

typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

Thanks for the quick review @killianmuldoon.

I think that does make sense, I did not see we already had all kind of verify jobs running in prow prechecks, I was too distracted by the github workflows.

At quick glance, it doesn't seem like the image we're using for the verify job contains plantuml. This would mean we either need it installed in that image, or we run generate-diagrams directly. I'm not sure the latter works (docker in docker?), but I will try to find out.

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure the latter works (docker in docker?), but I will try to find out.

Ideally we'd simply be able to run verify-diagrams as part of the verify job. That should ensure we have plantuml installed and then run the build. You're right about it probably not working with the docker image though - we'll need to find some solution for that. Do we have Java available in the image we use for the verify jobs?

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 4, 2023
@typeid
Copy link
Contributor Author

typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

I wasn't able to find java installed in the gcr.io/k8s-staging-test-infra/kubekins-e2e:v20230727-ea685f8747-1.28 image either.

Installing plantuml within the verification image via dnf results in a very old version (PlantUML version 1.2020.02). This old version also produces different images than the version we use (1.2023).

I see a few options here if we want to use the prow job:

  • if we can update the k8s-staging-test-infra image to contain plantuml/java, we'd have to always keep the plantuml versions in sync with that image's version.
  • if we don't want to update the image, we could still install java and then download the plantuml jar file on every CI run. This would offer more flexibility but bloats the job a lot, and definitely isn't best practice.

For either of these options, we also wouldn't be able to re-use the job calling docker run.

Thanks for adding the ok-to-test, it seems like the git diff failed because it was called in a wrong repository. I'll see if I can fix that in the meantime. :)

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/area ci

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/ci Issues or PRs related to ci and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Sep 4, 2023
@typeid
Copy link
Contributor Author

typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

/retest

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Sep 4, 2023

Can we simply run the generate-diagrams target which runs plantuml via Docker? (the verify job already has docker-in-docker enabled)

(+ the usual verify around it)

@typeid typeid changed the title 🌱 feat: re-generate plantuml images in CI [WIP] 🌱 feat: re-generate plantuml images in CI Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 4, 2023
@typeid typeid changed the title [WIP] 🌱 feat: re-generate plantuml images in CI 🌱 feat: re-generate plantuml images in CI Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2023
@typeid
Copy link
Contributor Author

typeid commented Sep 4, 2023

@sbueringer Thanks for the hint, I did not expect that to work. The latest push should do the trick, sorry for the experimenting!

I also noticed that quite a few verify-* jobs aren't run in the verify make target, notably:

  • verify-security
  • verify-govulncheck
  • verify-container-images

See:

ALL_VERIFY_CHECKS = licenses boilerplate shellcheck tiltfile modules gen conversions doctoc capi-book-summary diagrams

.PHONY: verify
verify: $(addprefix verify-,$(ALL_VERIFY_CHECKS)) lint-dockerfiles ## Run all verify-* targets

Is this intended? I believe they're not run in CI at the moment.

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

I also noticed that quite a few verify-* jobs aren't run in the verify make target

This is intended - these scans are currently not run on PRs and are instead run as part of the weekly security scan: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/main/.github/workflows/weekly-security-scan.yaml

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great and seems to be working - can you try to make it fail - by changing the plantuml spec maybe - so we can see what the output of this job failing is like?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 4, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Error looks good:

make generate-diagrams-proposals
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/prow/go/src/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api'
docker run -v /home/prow/go/src/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/docs:/docs  plantuml/plantuml:1.2023 /docs/proposals/**/*.plantuml
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/prow/go/src/sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api'
diff --git a/docs/proposals/images/machine-health-check/mhc.png b/docs/proposals/images/machine-health-check/mhc.png
index 395a7bba2..a50e002f6 100644
Binary files a/docs/proposals/images/machine-health-check/mhc.png and b/docs/proposals/images/machine-health-check/mhc.png differ
generated diagrams are out of date, run make generate-diagrams
make: *** [Makefile:679: verify-diagrams] Error 1

If you revert that commit I think this one is good to go!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks - great work!
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 54ea2f9c84b2f51732cd451a855c2a7afb97d0f2

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle 🌱 Verify plantuml image generation in CI

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title 🌱 feat: re-generate plantuml images in CI 🌱 Verify plantuml image generation in CI Sep 4, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much!!

Pretty happy that we don't have to deal with Java 😂

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 48f0a67 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 5, 2023
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.6 milestone Sep 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/ci Issues or PRs related to ci cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ensure reproducible image generation for docs and proposals
4 participants